War on Terror - Beginning of the New World Order

The world is terrorized by a word and the word is “Terrorism”. Where'd it come from and what does it mean. The origin of this word is well known. It was frequently used by George W. Bush and his team after 9/11 incident. It became a frequently spoken word in the international speeches, seminars, political rallies, news channels, news papers and in the general public. I asked several people to define the word, “Terrorism”, but some of them could not do so and many people define the term “Terrorism” in entirely different way. In fact, internationally, there is no official or universally excepted definition exists today. How would you make a difference between a “Freedom fighter” and a “Terrorist”? A question that will drive you crazy.
As I discussed in my previous blog, there is a media war going on. The Psychological warfare commonly known as psy-Ops, is waging against us by the west. The U.S. Department of Defense defines psychological warfare as:

"The planned use of propaganda and other psychological actions having the primary purpose of influencing the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of hostile foreign groups in such a way as to support the achievement of national objectives."

This propaganda or psychological warfare is the main reason, why this term “terrorism” is widely spread all over the world. Interestingly, no one knows what is terrorism and who are the terrorists and what are the targets of so-called “War on Terror”. Wikipedia writes in the section of “Terrorism”:

“The definition of terrorism has proved controversial. Various legal systems and government agencies use different definitions of terrorism in their national legislation. Moreover, the international community has been slow to formulate a universally agreed, legally binding definition of this crime. These difficulties arise from the fact that the term "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged.” 

 Bruce Hoffman, a well-known scholar, has noted that:

“It is not only individual agencies within the same governmental apparatus that cannot agree on a single definition of terrorism. Experts and other long-established scholars in the field are equally incapable of reaching a consensus.”

 When I asked the people, “who is terrorist?” or name any terrorist you know, the replies are the common, I hope you have got my point. It is the clear evidence of Psychological warfare. Media is the easy way to propaganda and psychological war, and media propagated Muslims as terrorist and Jihad as terrorism. That is why the so-called war on terror is a war that is still fighting to secure the objectives of Zionists against Muslims. One by one, Muslim countries are facing insurgencies and attacks on their lands supported by Americans and NATO.
Wikipedia define the “war on terror” in these words:

“The War on Terror (also known as the Global War on Terror or the War on Terrorism) is a term commonly applied to an international military campaign led by the United States and the United Kingdom with the support of other NATO as well as non-NATO countries. Originally, the campaign was waged against al-Qaeda and other militant organizations with the purpose of eliminating them. The phrase 'War on Terror' was first used by US President George W. Bush and other high-ranking US officials to denote a global military, political, legal and ideological struggle against organizations designated as terrorist and regimes that were accused of having a connection to them or providing them with support or were perceived, or presented as posing a threat to the US and its allies in general. It was typically used with a particular focus on militant Islamists and al-Qaeda.”

 What do they mean by “Perceived or presented as posing a threat”. As far as I understand that, it is all up to Americans, they will define who is terrorist and who is not and they will attack in the name of war on terror, any where in the world. Can anyone explain that why they attacked Afghanistan and then Iraq. No one knows exactly what is really going on.

The “war on terror” drama was started after the 9/11 incident, which was also a big false flag operation of CIA and Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency. There are many evidences presented on the print and electronic media as well as social media about this false flag operation, the 9/11 drama and many documentry films were made to disclose the reality, not by Muslim but American themselves like “Fahrenheit 9/11” and “Loose change”. The 9/11 drama was the part of the big picture, “The New World Order”.


The Gulf War – The Beginning 

After the cold war, American think tanks shifted their focus towards the middle east, which is the most disputed and important place in the world. The allies of the Iran –Iraq war Saddam and Ronald Reagan-Bush administration including Donald Rumsfeild and others became great enemies. That was the start of US policy of reshaping the political world commonly known as “The New World Order”.
I first heard that term “The New World Order”, when I was a school going kid and I didn't understand what was that. But now, I clearly understand the true meaning of it. The term was first used by the George Bush Sr. In his speech :

“We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a new world order -- can emerge: a new era -- freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come.” 

(Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf Crisis and the Federal Budget Deficit - September 11, 1990)

This speech was delivered just before the Gulf war (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991). In August, 1990 Iraq invaded Kuwait and captured in two days war and declared it as its 19th province. I think Saddam Hussein, the President of Iraq was a stupid man,who used as a puppet in the hands of American who were the close ally in the Iran-Iraq war. The British journalists John Bulloch and Harvey Morris wrote:

 “Part of the US dilemma in the Gulf was that the United States was committed to the territorial integrity of a state, Iran, whose rulers were implacably hostile to it. Washington wished to protect other states in the region from Iranian expansionism as well as protecting Iran from that of the Soviet Union, so that coupled with a natural and publicly supported wish to do down the Khomeini regime was a more pragmatic need to see the survival of a stable, independent and anti-communist Iran.”

 According to Wikipedia:

“United States support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War, against post-revolutionary Iran, included several billion dollars worth of economic aid, the sale of dual-use technology, non-U.S. origin weaponry, military intelligence, Special Operations training, and direct involvement in warfare against Iran. President Ronald Reagan initiated a strategic opening to Iraq, signing National Security Decision Directive 4-82 and selecting Donald Rumsfeld as his emissary to Hussein, whom he visited in December 1983 and March 1984.”

 “The Iran–Iraq War was extremely costly in lives and material, the deadliest war ever fought between developing countries. Both countries were devastated by the effect of the war. It cost Iran an estimated 1 million casualties, killed or wounded, and Iranians continue to suffer and die as a consequence of Iraq's use of chemical weapons. Iraqi casualties are estimated at 250,000–500,000 killed or wounded. Thousands of civilians died on both sides in air raids and ballistic missile attacks.”

 This war lead Iraq to a huge debt of over $80 billion and Iraq was isolated in the world. Meanwhile Kuwait get richer because Iraq could not continue its production of oil due to war. Saddam Hussein therefore began to think about using his armed forces to insist upon resolution of the border and monetary disputes with Kuwait. Hence the famous meetings with Robert Dole and other US senators in April, 1990 and April Glaspie (April Catherine Glaspie is a former American diplomat and senior member of the Foreign Service, best known for her role in the events leading up to the Persian Gulf War of 1991) in July, 1990 let to the war. At that July meeting, less than a month before the invasion of Kuwait, Hussein complained that the borders of Kuwait and Iraq were drawn in colonial times, by colonial powers. April Glaspie replied:

"We studied history at school. They taught us to say freedom or death. I think you know well that we... have our experience with the colonialists. We have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait."

April Glaspie with Saddam Hussein

Very meaningful, I think you got it. It was a clear message to Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait. Iraq was the second largest military power of the region after Israel and It was a threat to the sovereignty of Israel. Iraq and America have other conflicts on oil prices as well. That was the golden opportunity to De-weaponized and seized the Iraqi growing power. That is why Americans gave the green signal to invade Kuwait.
Meanwhile, Americans agreed to help Kuwaiti officials in the case of invasion took place. On July 30th, Sheikh Sabeh Ahmed al-Jaber al-Sabah, the brother of the Emir of Kuwait, and foreign minister, was speaking to Jordanian diplomats, ridiculed the Iraqi forces, and when the Jordanians criticize him, he said:

"If they don't like it, let them occupy our territory ... we are going to bring in the Americans." 

That was the cunning game plan of Americans to destroy the Iraqi growing military power, to protect the Israel and to control the oil prices of the middle east. Great plan..

"O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and Christians for friends. They are friends one to another. He among you who taketh them for friends is (one) of them. Lo! Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk." (Al Maidah 5:51)

  On the 2nd August, 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait and that is how Americans started their “Quest for Peace” and “War against terror”.

But America had formed a very sensitive coalition with the Arabs and this coalition was very fragile. President George H.W. Bush said:

"Our nation, now imports nearly half the oil it consumes and could face a major threat to its economic independence."

 If Israeli nation enter the war against Iraq, the Arab alliance would crumble. Arab countries would not fight along the side of the Israelis, and American knew that. American forces would lose the forward operating base of Saudi Arabia and other key strategic locations to strike against Iraq, that is why they installed the Patriot missile defense system in Israel for possible attacks of Scud missiles from Iraq and thats how, Saddam’s strategy failed to involve Israel into war and to gain the sympathy of Arabs and rest of the Muslim world.

Military personnel examine the tail section of an Al Hussein missile
shot down by a Patriot Missile during Operation Desert Storm 1991.

If Saudi Arabia was attacked and Iraqi captured the main oil fields of Saudis then it would be a great threat to US. That is why the first step to invade Iraq is called “Operation Desert Shield” i.e. to protect Israel by providing missile defense system and to protect Saudi oil fields.
After achieving his goal in Middle East, Bush Sr. Said:

“What is at stake is more than one small country; it is a big idea: a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind -- peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle and worthy of our children's future.”  

(Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union - January 29th, 1991)

So, that was not about the a small country; Kuwait. Actually it was all about implementing the new order and reshaping the Middle East politically, means New World Order. Bush admitted that in his speech, and yes he is right, he has secured American children's future by capturing the oil reserves of Iraq, getting control over Middle East and killing thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq. In another speech, Bush said:

“This is an historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold war. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order -- a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful -- and we will be -- we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N's founders.” 

(Address to the Nation Announcing Allied Military Action in the Persian Gulf January 16th, 1991)

Now, lets explore the Credible United Nations, its peace keeping role and vision of the U.N’s founders. According to Wikipedia:

“The earliest concrete plan for a new world organization was begun under the aegis of the U.S. State Department in 1939. Franklin D. Roosevelt first coined the term 'United Nations' as a term to describe the Allied countries. The term was first officially used on 1 January 1942, when 26 governments signed the Atlantic Charter, pledging to continue the war effort. On 25 April 1945, the UN Conference on International Organization began in San Francisco, attended by 50 governments and a number of non-governmental organizations involved in drafting the United Nations Charter. The UN officially came into existence on 24 October 1945 upon ratification of the Charter by the five then-permanent members of the Security Council—France, the Republic of China, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States—and by a majority of the other 46 signatories.”

The five permanent members are really credible enough, because all are the leading nuclear powers and leading arms exporting countries countries in the world. It is so hilarious that the arms exporting countries are the peace keeper's flagship. They also hold the power of “Veto”, which means, these five permanent members can halt and reject any possible action approved by the UN Security Council, is this called the rule of law and justice. Since 1982, the US has vetoed 32 Security Council resolutions critical of Israel, more than the total number of vetoes cast by all the other Security Council members.

Genocide of Muslims in Bosnia committed by Serbs troops in the presence of UN peacekeeping troops is a big question mark. Genocide of Muslims is still in progress in Palestine by Zionists and in Kashmir by Indian Army but UN is doing nothing to stop this brutality.

United Nations Security Council is a platform to provide the implementation of the strategic interest and policies of the permanent members. There are many examples regarding this and The Gulf war for the liberation of Kuwait and protection of Israel is one of them. Liberation East Timor and Southern Sudan and the military intervention in Libya through NATO are the other examples of the interests of the world leading powers.

Another group of “Credible United Nations” is North Atlantic Treaty Organization or commonly known as NATO. Americans are using UN’s platform to implement its own strategic plans by using NATO forces all over the world, imposing economic sanctions and implementing the idea of New World Order by disintegrating the Muslim countries into smaller ethnic states to gain control of the Muslim world. Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and now Pakistan are the common examples. American and Israeli objectives in Pakistan will be discussed later.


The 9/11 drama:

It was all started after the defeat of Soviet Union (USSR) in Afghanistan, which was also the end of the “Cold war” between to two powers of the world. Soviet Union disintegrated into many countries of Central Asia. Mujahideen of Afghanistan defeated Russian forces with the help of Pakistani government, Funds provided by the Arab world and intelligence and equipment provided by the US government and fighters from all over the Muslim world. Afghanistan would be a peaceful and progressive country after the defeat of Russians but there was a civil war breakout and a stable governing system never established since then. But some years of peace can be observed when Taliban ruled Afghanistan under the command of Mullah Omar.

The final troop withdrawal started on May 15, 1988, and ended on February 15, 1989 under the last Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. After withdrawal of the soviets, US had achieved his goal to defeat Soviet Union, left behind the Afghanistan without any central government system, that is why civil war started between the war lords. At the time of great chaos, Mullah Omar declared war against the these filthy war lords. One by one they capture the cities and people welcomed them because they brought peace in Afghanistan. Drugs production and trafficking was almost nil.

Meanwhile, American shifted their focus on middle east to capture its oil resources and to control the Middle East politically to protect Israel. After US invasion on Iraq in 1990, the hatred began to rise in Muslims all over the world. Specially in Arabs. The Arab Mujahideen, who fought in Afghan war against USSR, in which the most distinguished is Osama bin Laden. When Saudi king Shah Fahad called Americans for help, that was Osama bin Ladin, who opposed this decision but his opposition was rejected by the Saudi officials. That was the birth of an organization commonly known as "Al Qaeda". In a 1997 CNN interview, bin Laden called the U.S. military presence an "occupation of the land of the holy places."

Taliban was limited to Afghanistan only, there aims and ambitions were to liberate their homeland from the bloody war lords. Like that, Al Qeada's main objective was to remove the US and allied troops out of the Middle East especially, Saudi Arabia. Because Muslim two most holiest places Makkah and Madina situated there.

In 2001, when Osama bin Laden was living a life of exile, incidence of 9/11 happened. Bin Laden initially denied involvement in the attacks. On September 16, 2001, bin Laden read a statement later broadcast by Qatar's Al Jazeera satellite channel denying responsibility for the attack.

"The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it."

"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons."

"I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders' rules. The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations."

CNN reported on September 16, 2001:

"Immediately after the attacks that demolished the World Trade Center's landmark twin towers and seriously damaged the Pentagon, officials of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban said they doubted bin Laden could have been involved in carrying out the actions.
The Taliban -- the fundamentalist Islamic militia that seized power in Afghanistan in 1996 -- denied his ties to terrorism and said they have taken away all his means of communication with the outside world."

According to Wikipedia the Federal Bureau of Investigation has stated that classified evidence linking al-Qaeda and bin Laden to the September 11 attacks is clear and irrefutable. The UK Government reached a similar conclusion regarding al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden's culpability for the September 11 attacks, although the government report notes that the evidence presented is not necessarily sufficient for a prosecutable case.

What was that classified evidence. Its still a mystery. No evidence provided to media and Afghan government but just a bunch of newspaper clippings as told by Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, Mullah Zaeef. The UK government report was based totally on assumptions, no solid evidence was provided against Osama bin Laden and Taliban.

September 11 attacks were the gold mine for the Bush administration. Like his father, the Bush Sr. President Bush used this opportunity to started the series of wars to attain his targets all over the Muslim world. After attacking the Afghanistan and the US government announced that they recovered a video tape, which was famous as "Bin Laden Confession" tape. A poor resolution video showing a guy look like Bin Laden talking about the 9/11 attacks.

Bin Laden's old picture Vs Bin Laden confession tape.
The difference is clear.

The translation of that tape was disputed as Wikipedia reported:

"In a videotape recovered by U.S. forces in November 2001 in Jalalabad, bin Laden was seen discussing the attack with Khaled al-Harbi in a way that indicates foreknowledge.The tape was broadcast on various news networks on December 13, 2001. The merits of this translation have been disputed. Arabist Dr. Abdel El M. Husseini stated: "This translation is very problematic. At the most important places where it is held to prove the guilt of bin Laden, it is not identical with the Arabic."

In my personal opinion, the tape was fake and morphed by CIA to justify the attack on Afghanistan without any clear evidence provided by US government. Another video was released in 2004 in which Osama bin Laden accepted that he did the 9/11, which was another CIA's super hit drama because this video was released when the presidential elections were going on in America. That tape changed the results in the favour of Bush and then he reelected for the next term.

Osama bin Laden delivering a message in October 2004
and Osama bin Laden as of September 7, 2007.
Two different Osama bin Laden.

Ron Suskind, an American journalist, noted that the CIA analysis of the Add captionvideo led them to the consensus view that the tape was designed strategically to help President Bush win reelection in 2004. Deputy CIA director John E. McLaughlin noted at one meeting,

"Bin Laden certainly did a nice favor today for the President."

Suskind quoted Jami Miscik, CIA deputy associate director for intelligence, as saying

"Certainly, he would want Bush to keep doing what he’s doing for a few more years."

 I think Osama was not stupid enough to release his Anti-American sentiments at the time of elections to qualify  Bush for the second time to carry on his war on terror. It was just a CIA's drama supported by Mossad like they stage 9/11.

After reading all this you can clearly understand that 9/11 was an inside job to implement the New World Order. It was a new Pearl Harbor to brainwash American people that they are under attack by Muslims and they have successfully done it by killing 3000 innocent Americans, so sad but everything is fair in love and war and war is a great business, however it was just few thousand innocent lives, but don't worry it was just the collateral damage.

Invasion of Afghanistan

After the 9/11 incident, Bush demanded to the Taliban government to destroy all bases of Al-Qaeda and handover Osama bin Laden. As I discussed earlier, there is no solid proof and evidence provided by the US government against bin Laden and Al Qaeda. Afghan Taliban government offered US officials to trial the accused Al Qaeda members in Afghan Court but refused by the Americans because it was decided to invade Afghanistan and 9/11 was just the false flag operation and an inside job to do it.

The Afghan village of Darya Khanah
is bombed on October 27, 2001.
[Source: Associated Press]

This invasion was also illegal in terms of  the international laws coded in UN charter. According to UN Charter, disputes are to be brought to the UN Security Council, which alone may authorize the use of force. Without this authorization, any military activity against another country is illegal. According to article 51 of UN Charter:

"Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security." 

(Article 51 - Chapter VII: Action with respect to threats to the peace, breaches, of the peace and Acts of Aggressions)

But the UN Security Council did not allowed the US-Lead military campaign against Afghanistan. Defenders of that invasion has a argument that Article 51 provides the right of self defense therefore American did not need the authorization of UNSC, but one thing I want ask is Self defense against whom? because Al Qaeda is not a nation, in fact they are Non-State Actors. All the alleged hijackers were not Afghans. Osama was not trialled and there was no legal accusation present against him. This war was not a self defense because Afghanistan did not attack US but American, in the name of self defense killed thousands of innocent Afghan men, women and children. This was is an Act of Aggression against Afghanistan and that was not a legitimate act.

Invasion of Iraq 

On March 19, 2003 US with Allied forces attacked Iraq with no legal reason and logical explanation. Invading Iraq also had no legitimacy because there is no involvement of Saddam Hussein  in 9/11 incident. Iraq never attacked American soil and there was no direct threat to American security. 9/11 alleged hijackers were not Iraqi's in fact most of them were Saudi Arabians as told by the CIA. So, there is no connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq or Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Then what is the reason behind the war, US Secretary of State Colin Powell explained the United Nations Security Council on 5 February 2003 in the following words:

"We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction; he's determined to make more. Given Saddam Hussein's history of aggression... given what we know of his terrorist associations and given his determination to exact revenge on those who oppose him, should we take the risk that he will not some day use these weapons at a time and the place and in the manner of his choosing at a time when the world is in a much weaker position to respond? The United States will not and cannot run that risk to the American people. Leaving Saddam Hussein in possession of weapons of mass destruction for a few more months or years is not an option, not in a post–September 11 world."

Wow, what a presentation it was, based totally on assumptions and accusation without no evidence and proof. A term used by Colin Powell "Weapons of mass destruction", have they found one? The answer is right here:

"In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion." 

(NBC News, 25-4-2005)

After two years of killing of innocent men, women and children in Iraq, the CIA claimed that they'd found nothing. It was clearly mentioned in the IAEA report in 2003 presented to United Nations Security Council before the invasion of Iraq:

"There is no indication of resumed nuclear activities in those buildings that were identified through the use of satellite imagery as being reconstructed or newly erected since 1998, nor any indication of nuclear-related prohibited activities at any inspected sites."

 "There is no indication that Iraq has attempted to import uranium since 1990."

"There is no indication that Iraq has attempted to import aluminium tubes for use in centrifuge enrichment."

"Although we are still reviewing issues related to magnets and magnet production, there is no indication to date that Iraq imported magnets for use in a centrifuge enrichment programme." 

(Statement to the United Nations Security Council by IAEA Director General Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei-7 March 2003 | New York, USA)

 The Weapons of Mass Destruction never found but what about the Iraqi people, who suffered badly. What about the mass killing done by the Americans and Allied forces in Iraq. According to Iraq Body Count, a group that relies on press reports, NGO-based reports and official figures to measure civilian casualties, approximately 7,500 civilians were killed during the invasion phase.

There were world wide series of Protests held in all the major cities of the world, including New York City-USA, Washington DC-USA, London-UK, Montreal-Canada and Rome-Italy. According to the French academic Dominique Reynié, between January 3 and April 12, 2003, 36 million people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the Iraq war. The biggest anti-war rally was held in Rome including three million people.

The February 15, 2003 anti-war protest in London.

Protesters in front of Complexe Guy-Favreau in Montreal

This was surely cannot justified by any reason, even American people who understand the truth are against this war. I am quoting an American pastor as concluding remarks:

 "The Iraq war is an unjust war and an evil war. We did not have the right before God to destroy Saddam Hussein and kill his people just because we suspected he might eventually attack the U.S. The preemptive strike policy Bush has established in his foreign policy, as part of his war on terrorism, is both unholy and pagan. It is not new -- many pagan countries embrace it. It gives us the right to declare war on any nation or people simply because they may own weapons of mass destruction, and we suspect that nation or people may use those weapons to attack us. No aggression is necessary to declare war, only suspicion. This is not true self-defense. When we go to war under this policy we are the aggressor and murderers. Also, we must ask this question -- who made us the judge over other nations to decide which ruler needs to fall or who made us the policemen of the world? This is an extremely arrogant policy, which sets us up above other nations. The more we will attack other nations under this policy, the more the wrath of the world's countries will be toward us. Also, God will not be pleased. In the end it may lead to a huge war where many counties will band together to attack the United States of America."

(The Iraq War -- A Christian Perspective by Pastor Steve Brown, M. Div.)

This is not the end, war on terror is still going on. The recent example is Libya. The Americans are plaining to invade Iran and then ultimately Pakistan because both countries have the nuclear capability that is why these countries are posing threats to USA and according to American think tank, all the threats must be eliminated like Iraq. American are going to disintegrate Iraq  into 3 smaller states. They also want to disintegrate Pakistan into different ethnic states like, Sindhudesh, Independent Baluchistan, and Independent Kashmir. That is why, they always support insurgents in Pakistan. It is time to think, realize the truth and wakeup. Pakistani people should understand what is going on in the world.